Cloud bills are killing your profit. You see the total amount rising, but you cannot see where the money is leaking, whether its idle resources, over-provisioned databases, forgotten dev environments, or something else.

This lack of visibility directly hits your EBITDA. For a mid-sized enterprise spending $2M annually on cloud, a 20% waste rate is $400,000. The cost of three senior engineers just vanished into thin air.

You need a tool that doesn’t just draw diagrams but also actively visualizes financial health and encourages saving. If Holori’s performance bottlenecks or limited enterprise reporting are slowing you down, this guide covers the 6 best alternatives to address these issues.

Why Teams Are Leaving Holori in 2026

Holori made a name for itself by combining FinOps cost data with infrastructure diagrams. However, as cloud environments scale, three specific limitations are forcing teams lean toward specialized alternatives.

Static Snapshot Limitation

Holori is excellent for creating a snapshot of your infrastructure for documentation. But in dynamic Kubernetes environments where pods spin up and down every minute, a static diagram is often obsolete by the time it renders.

Teams need real-time, live execution, not just a historical record of what the cloud looked like an hour ago.

Visualization vs. Optimization

Holori identifies anomalies visually (e.g., This red box is expensive). However, it lacks the Agentic capability to fix them. It relies on humans to interpret the diagram and take action.

Competitors, like costimizer, now offer Autopilot modes that resize or terminate resources with minimal human intervention.

Performance at Scale

User reviews indicate that as infrastructure grows to thousands of nodes, diagram generation can become sluggish. Large enterprises often find that visual tools are hard to render complex multi-account environments without significant lag, making them less useful for quick troubleshooting.

Benefits of Switching to an Enterprise-Grade Alternative

1. Speed: Dashboards that load in seconds, not minutes, regardless of infrastructure size.
2. Accuracy: Financial data and IaC exports that you can trust blindly for deployment.
3. Actionability: Moving from seeing the cost to fixing it automatically.

Best Holori Alternatives Compared

Below is a breakdown answering common technical questions for decision-makers.

Deep Dive on Integration Capabilities:

• Custom Webhooks: Tools such as Costimizer and CloudZero let you set up custom webhooks. This means if a daily spend spike is detected, the system can automatically ping a Slack channel or create a Jira ticket for the on-call engineer.
• Power BI & Warehousing: For CFOs who use Power BI, data portability is key. Costimizer allows you to export clean, normalized cost data directly into your corporate data warehouse, enabling you to blend cloud spend data with revenue data for margin analysis.

Alright, let’s see each one in detail.

1. Costimizer

Best For: Guaranteed Savings & AI-Driven FinOps Automation

Type: Agentic Cloud Management Platform

Costimizer has positioned itself as more than just a reporting tool; it also acts as an autonomous Cost Guard for your cloud.

While Holori focuses heavily on the diagram aspect of infrastructure, Costimizer focuses on the financial outcome of that infrastructure.

The Core Difference: In one word its Guaranteed Outcomes. Most tools sell you software and hope you use it correctly. Costimizer offers a unique model that guarantees savings.

This shifts the risk from you (the buyer) to them (the vendor). If the tool doesn’t find savings, the value proposition adjusts, making it a low-risk decision for CFOs.

Key Features for Decision Makers:

• Agentic AI for FinOps: Unlike static rule sets, Costimizer uses Agentic AI that continuously monitors and can actively execute changes (such as decommissioning idle resources) when permitted. It doesn’t just alert you; it stops the bleeding.
• Security First: Security is paramount. Data is encrypted during transit (TLS 1.2/1.3) and at rest (AES-256), ensuring compliance with strict enterprise standards.
• Visualization: It provides interactive dashboards that let you drill down from a global view to a specific service-level spend, identifying anomalies in real time.

Integration & Accessibility:

• Mobile Access: Yes, allowing leaders to approve urgent cost-saving actions on the go.
• Data Export: Supports export to Power BI and data warehouses for custom financial modeling.
• Webhooks/API: Full REST API support allows you to trigger internal workflows (e.g., Jira tickets) when budget thresholds are breached.

Why it replaces Holori: If your primary goal with Holori was to view costs and reduce them manually, Costimizer makes this even easier: it can show you the cost and automatically reduce it.

What If Your Cloud Optimized Itself? Watch Costimizer In Action

2. Lucidscale (by Lucidchart)

Best For: Enterprise-grade cloud visualization and architecture audits.

Type: Cloud Visualization Platform

If you need Holori solely for its diagramming capabilities, Lucidscale is the market leader. It automatically generates diagrams from your cloud provider data (AWS, Azure, GCP) and allows deep filtering and customization.

• Dynamic Filtering: Unlike static diagrams, you can filter views by region, instance type, or tag to verify compliance or security groups.
• Collaboration: Built on the Lucidchart engine, it offers superior collaboration features for teams annotating architecture reviews.

Trade-off: It is purely for documentation and visualization. It has no cost optimization execution capabilities.

3. Hava.io

Best For: Automated documentation and security compliance.

Type: Automated Network Topology

Hava focuses on hands-free documentation. It connects to your cloud and automatically generates interactive network topology diagrams. It detects changes and updates the diagrams in real-time, keeping a version history of your architecture.

• Version Control: You can rewind your diagrams to see what your network looked like last week, invaluable for security incidents.
• Security View: It generates security diagrams that show open ports and traffic ingress/egress points.

Trade-off: Like Lucidscale, it is an observer. It cannot modify resources or reduce costs.

4. Cloudcraft

Best For: Designing AWS architectures (Design-first).

Type: Architecture Design Tool

Cloudcraft (acquired by Datadog) is beloved for its beautiful 3D isometric diagrams. It is often used before infrastructure is built to estimate costs and design layouts.

• Blueprinting: Great for planning new environments and getting a cost estimate before deployment.
• AWS Focus: It is heavily optimized for AWS, offering a rich set of AWS-specific icons and data for Amazon services.

Trade-off: Its multi-cloud support is weaker than Holori's or Lucidscale's, and it is less automated for existing, messy infrastructure.

5. Vantage

Best For: FinOps reporting without the diagrams.

Type: Cloud Cost Management

If you used Holori for cost allocation rather than diagrams, Vantage is a stronger financial tool. It excels at multi-cloud reporting and Virtual Tagging to organize costs without changing infrastructure.

• Autopilot: Offers automated savings features (such as RI management) that Holori lacks.
• Financial Depth: Provides better forecasting and unit economics than visual tools.

Trade-off: It does not generate topology diagrams. You get graphs and tables, not maps.

6. Brainboard

Best For: Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) generation.

Type: CI/CD & Diagramming

Brainboard lets you draw your architecture and then automatically generates Terraform code to deploy it. It reverses the Holori model: instead of diagramming what exists, you diagram what you want, and Brainboard builds it.

• Diagram-to-Code: A massive time saver for platform engineers setting up new environments.
• Drift Detection: Alerts you if the actual cloud state differs from your diagram.

Trade-off: It is a deployment tool, not a cost-saving tool.

How to Choose the Right Holori Alternative?

The best tool depends on the problem you want to solve, whether it is a Documentation problem or a Financial problem.

Here is the 3-Point Decision Checklist:

1. Do you need to fix the bill? If your main pain point is high cloud costs, diagramming tools won't help. You need Execution. Look for: An Agentic AI (like Costimizer) that connects to your cloud and actively terminates/resizes resources to lower your invoice.
2. Do you need to pass an audit? If you need to prove to auditors how your network is secured, you need History. Look for: Tools like Hava or Lucidscale that keep versioned histories of your topology diagrams.
3. Are you designing or managing? If you are building new things, look for Design tools (Cloudcraft/Brainboard). If you are managing an existing mess, look for Observability (Vantage/Costimizer).

Which Tool Should You Pick?

If you need a static map for a one-time compliance audit, Lucidscale is the industry standard.

If you are architecting a new AWS environment from scratch, Cloudcraft is your best design partner.

But if your actual problem is a cloud bill that bleeds profit, you don’t need another diagram; you need a Cost Guard. Costimizer is the only solution here that moves beyond passive viewing to active fixing. With its Agentic AI and guaranteed savings model, it doesn't just report on waste; it eliminates it.

Don’t let another billing cycle pass. Switch to the costimizer today.

Try Costimizer Free

FAQs